Why subscription brands overspend when they optimise for ROAS
Why subscription brands overspend on ROAS: the first box is counted at full value while churn decides whether the customer ever pays back.
Share of coffee & tea subscription renewal cycles ending in active churn (Recharge)
20.7%
Source: Recharge: Supplement subscriptions have the leakiest first reorder, published Jul 2026, updated Aug 2026, accessed 28 Sept 2026. Full citation
Recharge platform data from Shopify subscription brands, covering renewal cycles and first-time subscriber cohorts from July 2025 to June 2026. This figure is for Recharge's Coffee & Tea category; it doesn't cover curated subscription boxes, and the post doesn't state how many coffee brands are included.
A coffee subscription is sold on the promise of the tenth box, but ROAS only sees the first. A campaign wins a subscriber, Google Ads records one order, and every renewal after that arrives without an ad click. The bid that won the subscriber was set on an assumption about how long they'll stay. The gap between ROAS and POAS is the gap between that assumption and what actually happens.
The figure above shows what actually happens to renewals. In Recharge's subscription data, covering July 2025 to June 2026, 20.7% of coffee and tea subscription renewal cycles ended in active churn: the subscriber cancelled. That was the joint highest of the five consumable categories Recharge compared, level with beauty. This figure covers coffee and tea subscriptions, not curated subscription boxes, which Recharge didn't break out.
How the gap forms
The first box is not the customer
Coffee's early numbers look excellent. In the same data, 99.3% of first-time coffee and tea subscribers completed a first reorder, the highest of the five categories. But only 9.3% of the cohort reached a sixth reorder, and 1.3% a twelfth. Coffee subscribers don't leave at the first box; they leave over the months that follow, which is exactly the period a payback calculation depends on.
Discounted first boxes
A heavily discounted or free first box wins subscribers cheaply, and ROAS records the win. But the discount means the first order earns little or nothing, so the whole acquisition cost has to be paid back by renewals. If subscribers attracted by a deep discount cancel faster, the payback never comes.
Illustrative arithmetic with made-up round numbers, not a benchmark.
A brand pays $30 to acquire a subscriber and offers the first box at half price. The first box earns $2 of margin; each full-price renewal earns $9.
- If the subscriber stays for five renewals, the brand earns $2 + 5 × $9 = $47: a $17 profit.
- If they cancel after two renewals, it earns $2 + 2 × $9 = $20: a $10 loss.
ROAS on the first order is identical in both cases.
Renewals counted as new conversions
If your subscription app sends renewal orders to Google Ads as conversions, the account can credit campaigns for revenue they didn't win this month. ROAS rises, and the bidding learns from customers who were already subscribed.
Working out your own gap
- Send only first orders to Google Ads as conversions, and track renewals in your subscription app.
- Build a cohort curve for each month's new subscribers: the share still active after one, three and six renewals.
- Compare cohorts by first-box offer. Subscribers won with a deep discount can behave differently from those who paid full price.
- Read cancellations by renewal number. If cancellations cluster right after a discounted first box, the offer is attracting the wrong subscribers. If they come later, the coffee, the price or the delivery cadence is the problem, and no bid change will fix it.
How to close it
- Set acquisition targets from your own cohort payback, not from an assumed lifetime value.
- Limit the first-box discount to what your cohorts show you can earn back.
- Offer skip and pause at cancellation. Recharge's data shows coffee subscribers skip 4.0% of renewal cycles; every skip that replaces a cancellation keeps the payback going.
How Coffee & Subscription Boxes compares
| Vertical | Renewal cycles that end in churn | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Supplements & Vitamins | 17.3% | Recharge: Supplement subscriptions have the leakiest first reorder, published Jul 2026, updated Aug 2026 |
| Coffee & Subscription Boxes | 20.7% | Recharge: Supplement subscriptions have the leakiest first reorder, published Jul 2026, updated Aug 2026 |
Questions
- Why does ROAS overstate a coffee subscription campaign?
- Because it counts only the first order, while the campaign's real value depends on how many renewals follow. In Recharge's data, 99.3% of new coffee and tea subscribers reordered once, but only 9.3% reached a sixth reorder.
- Should renewal orders be sent to Google Ads as conversions?
- No. Send only first orders, so the bidding learns from the new subscribers each campaign actually won. Renewals counted as conversions credit campaigns for customers who were already subscribed.
- Is a free or half-price first box worth it?
- Only if the subscribers it wins stay long enough to pay back both the discount and the acquisition cost. Compare cohorts by first-box offer at month three before deciding.
The same question in other verticals
Work it out for your own store
Source and how to read this number
- Figure
- Share of coffee & tea subscription renewal cycles ending in active churn (Recharge): 20.7%
- Source
- Recharge: Supplement subscriptions have the leakiest first reorder, published Jul 2026, updated Aug 2026
- Link
- https://getrecharge.com/blog/supplement-subscription-retention/
- Accessed
- 28 Sept 2026
- Caveat
- Recharge platform data from Shopify subscription brands, covering renewal cycles and first-time subscriber cohorts from July 2025 to June 2026. This figure is for Recharge's Coffee & Tea category; it doesn't cover curated subscription boxes, and the post doesn't state how many coffee brands are included.
- Last reviewed
- 30 Sept 2026