Pet Products: POAS, COGS and margin benchmarks

US pet spending reached $158 billion in 2025, and $68.3 billion of it went on food and treats, according to the American Pet Products Association. A growing share is bought online. Pet stores sell two different businesses under one brand: heavy, repeat-purchase consumables and lighter hard goods such as toys and beds. The same ROAS means very different profit depending on which one a campaign sells, and on whether its customers come back. The pages below cover what a healthy return looks like, where ROAS misleads, what belongs in a pet store's cost of goods, and how to scale spend on both halves of the business.

The questions, with sourced numbers

  • What's a healthy POAS?

    What POAS pet products stores need on Google Ads when heavy food and litter orders sit beside higher-margin toys and accessories in one account.

    2.88Median Google Ads ROAS
  • Why does optimising for ROAS overspend?

    Why pet stores overspend on ROAS: heavy consumables post strong ROAS on thin margin, while free-shipping competitors set customer expectations.

    $68.3B of $158BUS spend on pet food & treats
  • What counts as COGS?

    Product cost, weight-based shipping, treat expiry and packaging: which pet product costs belong in COGS when measuring POAS on Google Ads.

    70.2%COGS as a share of sales (one company)
  • How do you scale spend profitably?

    How to scale Google Ads for a pet store on profit: split consumables from hard goods, price autoship acquisition, and cut orders that ship at a loss.

    An estimated 41%US pet product sales made online

Background reading

Other verticals

All benchmarks and how we source them