What counts as COGS for a supplement brand

Ingredients, contract manufacturing, batch testing, packaging and expiry: which supplement costs belong in COGS when measuring POAS on Google Ads.

Cost of goods as a share of net sales, FitLife Brands, 2025 (10-K)

61.4%

Source: FitLife Brands, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filed 31 Mar 2026), accessed 30 Sept 2026. Full citation

FitLife reports a gross margin of 38.6% for 2025, so cost of goods was 61.4% of net sales. About 49% of its 2025 sales went through Amazon's US marketplace and 14% to GNC. Excluding an acquisition-related inventory adjustment, its gross margin would have been 39.9%. This is one small listed company, not an industry average, so treat it as a reference point, not a target.

For measuring POAS, "cost of goods" means every cost that scales with each order you sell. Ad spend is not included, because it's the other side of the ratio. For a supplement brand, the capsules themselves can be a small part of it. The bottle, the testing, the marketplace fees and the shipping all count too.

What goes in

CostCount it?Why
Ingredients or finished product from the contract manufacturerYesThe base of unit cost
Manufacturing and encapsulationYesCharged per unit or per batch
Ingredient and batch testing, spread per unitYesRequired under the FDA's manufacturing rules for supplements
Bottles, seals, desiccants, labelsYesPer unit
Inbound freightYesPart of landed cost
Pick, pack and outbound shipping you payYesScales with orders
Marketplace referral and fulfilment feesYes, on marketplace ordersCharged on every sale through the marketplace
Payment processing feesYesA share of every direct order
Stock written off at expiryYes, spread across units soldBest-before dates turn slow stock into a cost
Returns that can't be resoldYes, spread across ordersAn opened bottle can't go back into stock
Subscribe-and-save discountsNo, they lower revenueCounting them as cost double-counts them
Formulation, clinical studies, creator seedingNoPaid once, or marketing
Google Ads spendNoIt's what POAS divides by

Supplement makers in the US must follow the FDA's current good manufacturing practice rules for dietary supplements, which include testing requirements for ingredients and finished products. Testing is charged per batch, so it costs more per bottle on a small run than a large one.

Returns are worth a look too. FitLife Brands, the company behind the figure above, refunds in full only for unopened, undamaged products, within 30 or 60 days depending on the brand. An opened bottle that comes back is a write-off, whatever your policy says about refunds.

Building one bottle's cost

Illustrative arithmetic with made-up round numbers, not a benchmark.

A bottle that sells for $40 direct:

  • Ingredients $5, manufacturing and bottle $3, testing allowance $0.50, label and seal $0.40: product cost $8.90.
  • Pick, pack and the shipping you pay: $6. Payment fees at 3% of $40: $1.20.

Cost per order: $16.10, or about 40% of the price. The product alone was about 22%.

Sell the same bottle at 15% off on subscription, for $34, and cost per order is $15.92: about 47% of the price.

Three levels of accuracy

Selvra OS works with three tiers of cost data and shows which one a figure is based on.

T1: one flat margin (labelled "estimated")

One percentage for the whole range. This is workable for a brand with a handful of similar products sold one way. It misleads once marketplace and direct sales, or single bottles and bundles, sit together.

T2: margin by category (labelled "approximate")

A margin per product type and channel: capsules, powders, gummies, bundles, and marketplace versus direct. Channel matters here as much as product, because marketplace fees change the margin on the same bottle.

T3: cost per product (labelled "verified" once synced)

Shopify's Cost per item field, per variant, read directly. Bottle sizes and multipacks are variants with different costs, so each needs its own figure.

Reading the benchmark above

The figure above is one listed company: FitLife Brands reported a gross margin of 38.6% for 2025, so its cost of goods was 61.4% of net sales. About 49% of its 2025 sales went through Amazon's US marketplace and 14% to GNC, so much of its revenue carries marketplace fees or wholesale pricing. It also completed an acquisition during the year; excluding an inventory accounting adjustment, its gross margin would have been 39.9%. It is one small company, so treat the figure as a reference point, not a target.

Common COGS mistakes in supplements

  • Counting only the capsules. Bottles, testing and shipping are per-unit costs too.
  • Leaving marketplace fees out of the margin on marketplace sales.
  • Ignoring expiry. Stock that runs out of shelf life is a cost of the stock that sold.

How Supplements & Vitamins compares

VerticalCOGS as a share of sales (one company)Source
Beauty & Skincare29.3%e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 March 2026 (filed 21 May 2026)
Supplements & Vitamins61.4%FitLife Brands, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filed 31 Mar 2026)
Jewelry & Accessories42.5%Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filed 17 Mar 2026)
Pet Products70.2%Chewy, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 1 February 2026 (filed 25 Mar 2026)
Toys & Baby51.3%Mattel, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filed 23 Feb 2026)
Outdoor & Sporting Goods42.6%YETI Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 3 January 2026 (filed 27 Feb 2026)

The same question in other verticals

Source and how to read this number

Figure
Cost of goods as a share of net sales, FitLife Brands, 2025 (10-K): 61.4%
Source
FitLife Brands, Inc. Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 (filed 31 Mar 2026)
Link
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001374328/000143774926010680/ftlf20251231_10k.htm
Accessed
30 Sept 2026
Caveat
FitLife reports a gross margin of 38.6% for 2025, so cost of goods was 61.4% of net sales. About 49% of its 2025 sales went through Amazon's US marketplace and 14% to GNC. Excluding an acquisition-related inventory adjustment, its gross margin would have been 39.9%. This is one small listed company, not an industry average, so treat it as a reference point, not a target.
Last reviewed
30 Sept 2026